Citizen’s Charter: Importance, Objective, Features, Problems faced in implementation, Guidelines In any nation, there is a need of good governance for sustainable development, both economic and social.
The three major aspects highlighted in good governance are transparency, accountability and responsiveness of the administration. Citizens’ Charters initiative is a response to the mission for solving the problems which a citizen meets, day in and day out, while dealing with the organizations providing public services.
The charter is the declaration of commitment to superiority in service to customers of the department. The citizen charter declares the standards for various services offered. It includes expectations of the Organization from the Citizens for fulfilling its commitment. Citizen charter is available on India post website.
The concept of Citizens’ Charter protects the trust between the service provider and its users. Citizens’ Charter was first expressed and implemented in the United Kingdom by the Conservative Government of John Major in 1991 as a national program with aim to constantly improve the quality of public services for the people of the country so that these services respond to the needs and wishes of the users.
Importance of Citizen’s Charter To make administration accountable and citizen friendly. To ensure transparency. To take measures to improve customer service. To adopt a stakeholder approach. To save time of both Administration and the citizen.
Objective of the Citizens’ Charter Fundamental objectives of Citizens’ Charter are as follows: Goal of Citizens’ Charter is to empower the citizen in relation to public service delivery.
Six principles of the Citizens’ Charter movement as originally framed were:
Quality: Improving the quality of services
Choice: Wherever possible
Standards: Specify what to expect and how to act if standards are not met
Value: For the taxpayers’ money
Accountability: Individuals and Organizations
Transparency: Rules/ Procedures/ Schemes/Grievances
Involvement of consumer organizations, citizen groups, and other stakeholders in the formulation of the Citizens’ Charter is highlighted to confirm that the Citizens’ Charter fulfills the needs of the users. Regular monitoring, review and evaluation of the Charters, both internally and through external agencies, are commanded. Till April, 2006, 111 Citizens’ Charters had been articulated by the Central Government Ministries/ Departments/ Organizations and 668 Charters by various agencies of State Governments & Administrations of Union Territories. Most of the national Charters are posted on the government’s websites and are open to public scrutiny.
The organizations with Citizens’ Charters are advised to give publicity to their Charters through such means as print/ electronic media and awareness crusades. Salient Features of a Citizen’s Charter The salient features of a Citizen’s Charter are: Agreed and published standards for service delivery; Openness and information about service delivery; ‘Choice’ and Consultation with users; Courtesy and helpfulness in service delivery; and Provision of redressed of grievances.
Let us elaborate these points:
Standards: The Charter should lay out explicit standards of service delivery so that users understand what they can reasonably expect from service providers. These standards should be time‐bound, relevant, accurate, measurable and specific. The actual performance vis‐à‐vis the standards adopted must be published and independently validated. The tendency among organizations to develop targets and standards based on their own convenience as opposed to the needs of the citizens must be avoided.
Information and openness: A key attribute of good service is the availability of relevant and concise information to the users at the right time and at the right place. The Charters should contain, in plain language, full and accurate information about services available, levels and quality of service to be expected, available channels for grievance redressed etc. Handbooks, guides, posters, websites are some of the channels through which information can be provided to citizens.
Choice and consultation: The Charter should provide choice of services to users wherever practicable. There should be regular and systematic consultation with the users of the service to fix service standards and to ascertain quality of service delivery.
Courtesy and helpfulness: The Charter can help embed a culture of courteous and helpful service from public servants. In addition, small initiatives such as ‘name badges’, ‘May I help you’ counters etc. can go a long way in building customer confidence.
Grievance redressed and complaints handling: There is a strong link between the provision of quality service and effective handling of complaints. Firstly, by facilitating and responding to complaints, the causes for complaint can be reduced. Secondly, by identifying ‘trends’ in complaints, the service provider can resolve systemic and recurring problems. Problems faced in implementing the Charters As indicated, the Citizens’ Charters initiative in India had started in 1997 and the Charters formulated are in embryonic stage of implementation. Introduction of a new thought is always difficult in any organization.
Introduction and implementation of the concept of Citizens’ Charter in the Government of India was much more complicated due to the old bureaucratic set up/procedures and the rigid attitudes of the work force. The major obstacles encountered in this initiative were: The general perception of organizations which formulated Citizens’ Charters was that the exercise was to be performed because there was a direction from the top. The consultation process was minimal or largely absent. It thus became one of the routine activities of the organization and had no focus.
For any Charter to thrive the personnel responsible for its implementation should have proper training and orientation, as commitments of the Charter cannot be expected to be delivered by a workforce that is unaware of the spirit and content of the Charter. However, in many cases, the concerned staff was not sufficiently trained and sensitized. Sometimes, transfers and reshuffles of concerned officers at the critical stages of formulation/implementation of a Citizens’ Charter in an organization severely destabilized the strategic processes which were put in place and hampered the progress of the initiative. Awareness campaigns to teach clients about the Charter were not conducted systematically. In some cases, the standards/time norms of services mentioned in Citizens’ Charter were either too negligent or too tight and were impractical and created an unfavorable impression on the clients of the Charter. The notion behind the Citizens’ Charter was not accurately understood.
Information brochures, publicity materials, pamphlets produced earlier by the organizations were mistaken for Citizens’ Charters. Deficiencies in the Existing Citizens’ Charters Lack of awareness and knowledge and inadequate publicity, hence loss of trust among service seekers No training to the operative and supervisory staff Lack of infrastructure and initiative Hierarchy gap between the Officers and the Operative Staff-Need of team effort Different mind-sets of officers and the Staff- Insensitiveness on the part of the Supervisors and the Staff because they are yet to be sensitized Staff is not prepared to shoulder the responsibility due to lack of motivation and accountability Non-revision, complicated and restrictive rules & procedures Guidelines for the Citizens’ Charters in Bangladesh List all Offices according to type of services they provide to public – Indicate their location, areas they cover, type of services being rendered to public, and phone numbers.
There should be a separate Citizens’ Charter (i.e., Local Citizens’ Charters) for each office covering the services they provide. For example, there should be a separate Charter of the Directorate, its subordinate offices, Hospitals, Schools, etc. according to the particular services they provide. Mention Service Standards – Step-by-step-Procedure based on ‘Where to go; how to proceed’, simple and easy to fill-in Forms, specimen of duly-filled in forms, documents, fees, etc. required, reasonable time schedule, Do’s & Don’ts, etc., names, addresses and Tele. Nos. of concerned Officials, his alternate for each service, etc. Minimum documentation, self-attestation and self-declaration. No duplication – In case desired information and document submitted earlier like proof of residence (if there is no change), birth certificate, etc., it should not be asked again. If promised services are not provided as per specified time schedule, an effective grievance redressed mechanism (including the provision of compensation to the concerned citizen in order to introduce accountability) should be introduced. Provision of TATKAL (Immediate) Services if somebody is in urgent need (as in the case of Passport, Railways, etc.) to avoid touts, bribery, etc. Simultaneous changes in the Performa and other requirements to be effected along with the changes made in the Citizens Charter.
Database of frequently required information, like ownership of property, vehicle, etc., tax and dues paid or pending, etc. If possible, the services and their related information may be presented in a tabular form. Salient features of each service should be prominently displayed in simple and easy language at all places likely to be visited by the service seekers.
Key lessons The following pitfalls need to be avoided: Since Citizen’s Charters are likely to raise the aspirations of the users of the service, the departments should guard against the tendency to promise more than they can deliver. A realistic assessment of the capabilities of the service provider must be taken into account in drafting the Charter. A critical review of the current systems and processes in the department should be undertaken to examine whether they are likely to have an adverse impact on the Charter. Implementing the Charters without the staff owning them will defeat the purpose of the Charter. Motivating the staff and involving them in the preparation of the Charter are extremely important. The Charters will remain merely a paper exercise of limited value if there is no consultation with the users. Departments should ensure user involvement at all stages of preparation and implementation of the Charter. Independent audit of results is important after a period of implementation of the Charter. Complex systems for lodging complaints or poor access to officers for redressed of grievances defeat the purpose and the spirit of the Charter. To summarize, A Citizens’ Charter denotes the promise of an organization towards standard, quality and time frame of service delivery, grievance redressed mechanism, clearness and accountability. Based on the foreseen expectations and aspirations of public, Citizens’ Charters are to be drawn-up with care and concern for the concerned service users. They allow the service seekers to avail the services of the government departments with minimum inconvenience and maximum speed.